System A · Complete buyer walkthrough
Follow a buyer creating delegation practice for new team leads. See the draft, the decisions they repair, what happens in a small try and all six files they keep.
Fictional teaching example from v0.7. The draft contains deliberate errors; the reviewer entries and both attempts are illustrative. This is a read-only tour. Your licensed workspace opens locally and uses your own permitted AI assistant.
Step 01
The buyer chooses Use my brief. Their task is to help new team leads write a delegation brief without inventing an owner or deadline.
FICTIONAL DEMONSTRATION SOURCE — not a real organisation policy. [S1] A delegation brief states the intended result, acceptance criteria, accountable owner and agreed due date. [S2] The recipient explains their understanding and next action, and raises unclear requirements or capacity concerns before committing. [S3] If an owner, date or requirement has not been agreed, mark it unconfirmed and discuss it. Do not invent a commitment to complete the brief. [S4] State a real deadline unambiguously, including its time zone where relevant. This guidance sets no default turnaround and assumes no shared working week. [S5] Practice scenario: an onboarding guide contains links that new starters cannot open. Coordinator Alex has been asked to help. The intended result is a guide whose links work with new-starter access. The acceptance check is to try the links using an approved new-starter test account. The accountable owner and due date have not been agreed. The exercise uses no actual account, document or credentials. [S6] This is a fictional training exercise. It creates no escalation rule, service standard or publication approval. Keep real personal records and credentials out of the exercise.
In the kit, the buyer confirms permission for the source and assistant, then selects Prepare my draft prompt. Optional language, title and context fields remain available.
Step 02
The buyer copies the prepared prompt into their approved AI assistant, then pastes its response back into System A. This tour uses a deliberately flawed teaching draft rather than a live model response.
## Clear delegation activity Ask learners to write a task brief for the onboarding guide. ## Reference response Result: the onboarding guide links work for new starters. Acceptance: try the links using an approved new-starter test account. Owner: Alex. Deadline: Friday at 17:00, as required for all delegated tasks. Ask Alex to repeat the task and next action. ## In-work job aid Record the result, acceptance criteria, owner and Friday deadline. Source: DELEGATION-DEMO [S1]–[S5].
A polished draft still needs source checking. Here it assigns Alex as owner and invents a mandatory Friday deadline.
Step 03
System A guides the buyer through six checks. The buyer inspects the material, makes the changes and confirms each check; the kit does not approve work on their behalf.
“Owner: Alex” becomes owner unconfirmed—ask and agree before recording a commitment. The Friday deadline becomes due date unconfirmed—agree it and include the time zone where relevant. The known result and acceptance check stay tied to the source.
Step 04
The fictional learner uses the card before seeing the reference response. The buyer records observations against three criteria.
The repair after attempt one: add “Before writing, identify the two unconfirmed decisions.” Keep the earlier record and link the revised attempt.
Next action: Retain the explicit unknowns instruction. Try with another representative colleague before wider use.
The same fictional colleague makes the second attempt; earlier practice may affect the result. These observations do not establish wider workplace impact. A buyer who has not tried the material can choose “Try later” and keep that status visible.
Step 05
Choose a file below to inspect its contents. The learning activity includes the facilitator reference; the separate learner card keeps its response fields blank.
For the intended learning audience
Fictional completed buyer example. The review declaration below illustrates a buyer's completed record; no actual buyer review or organisational approval is claimed.
Write a task brief that separates confirmed requirements from decisions that still need agreement.
New starters cannot open links in an onboarding guide. Coordinator Alex has been asked to help. The accountable owner and due date have not been agreed. [S5]
Suggested facilitation: 10 minutes, in pairs or individually. This timing is a design choice. Before writing, identify the two unconfirmed decisions in the scenario. Then write a brief covering the intended result, acceptance criteria, owner and due date. Mark anything unconfirmed. Write the question you would ask before anyone commits. Then explain the next action in your own words. [S1]–[S3]
Result: onboarding guide links work with new-starter access. Acceptance check: try the links using an approved new-starter test account. No real login is needed in this exercise. [S5] Owner: unconfirmed. Ask Alex whether they can own the task; agree the responsible person before recording a commitment. [S3], [S5] Due date: unconfirmed. Agree it with the responsible person; include the time zone if relevant. No Friday deadline is supplied. [S3]–[S5] Understanding check: ask the recipient to explain the result, next action and any requirement or capacity concern before committing. [S2]
Check all four brief fields. Has the learner retained the known result and acceptance check, kept the unknown owner and date visible, and asked for agreement? An invented owner or deadline needs repair. Ask: What can you confirm now, and what still needs discussion?
Result → Acceptance check → Agreed owner → Agreed due date → Recipient explains the next action. If something is unknown, mark it unconfirmed and agree who will clarify it. Use only permitted material when applying this in actual work. [S1]–[S4], [S6]
DELEGATION-DEMO v1.0, 2026-10-16. Brief fields [S1]; understanding [S2]; unknowns [S3]; dates [S4]; scenario [S5]; practice boundary [S6].
Read-only content preview of the existing fictional example; formatting is adapted for the web. Word files remain editable in the buyer’s downloaded pack. The resume pane shows an excerpt. The reusable kit and its exporter are supplied through licensed access.
Edit the Word material, share the customised activity and card with the intended audience, and keep the private source/review record and resume file in approved storage. Import the saved JSON to continue later.
The owner assigns named creators in My Library. A teammate using the reusable kit needs a seat; learners receiving finished material do not. Choose self-review or colleague review and record who actually inspected the work. Hand over the learner materials while protecting the private source record.
Other output types have five files; delegation adds the learner card. These generated files do not change the kit’s count of 11 assets. THRIVE keeps its original domains, BIAE model and role expectations. The 90-day continuation and consulting remain optional.
Review the 11 assets, requirements and individual or team licences.
